Post by account_disabled on Jan 11, 2024 8:01:16 GMT
taking into account the repercussions of the Decree. Yesterday, they reiterated the urgency again. 2. The question regarding the draw of this process for the exercise of rapporteurship was superseded. Regarding the underlying issue, it appears that, in the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality nº 3.075-2/PR, the Plenary suspended the effectiveness of Law of the State of Paraná nº 14.235/03, which had implied the prohibition of the State Executive Power “from initiate, renew, maintain, on an exclusive basis, for any private banking institution, the deposit accounts of the state tax collection system, the value movement and payment system SIAF – Integrated Financial Administration System and the.
General State Treasury account /revenue account, single account, funds and programs account, deposit accounts and movements of indirect administration entities and public foundations, as well as the availability of state funds and public service payments, without carrying out the respective bidding process”. The rule was also suspended, stating that the state Executive Power was respons Phone Number List ible for the immediate revocation of all acts and contracts signed under the conditions set out in article 1 of that law. The syllabus of the ruling refers to the potential offense to the principle of Administration reserve and precedents.
As for the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality No. 3,578-9/DF, it is said to be disrespectful in that it suspended the effectiveness of article 4, § 1, of Provisional Measure No. 2,192-70/01 – on the maintenance of cash availability in the States of Federation in privatized banks until 2010 –, given the circumstance that the phenomenon occurred, considered effective, that is, from the moment the injunction was granted. In this case, the situation is portrayed in the Decree which, contrary to what was asserted, is in harmony with what was decided in the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality No. 3.075-2/PR, at least with regard to.
General State Treasury account /revenue account, single account, funds and programs account, deposit accounts and movements of indirect administration entities and public foundations, as well as the availability of state funds and public service payments, without carrying out the respective bidding process”. The rule was also suspended, stating that the state Executive Power was respons Phone Number List ible for the immediate revocation of all acts and contracts signed under the conditions set out in article 1 of that law. The syllabus of the ruling refers to the potential offense to the principle of Administration reserve and precedents.
As for the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality No. 3,578-9/DF, it is said to be disrespectful in that it suspended the effectiveness of article 4, § 1, of Provisional Measure No. 2,192-70/01 – on the maintenance of cash availability in the States of Federation in privatized banks until 2010 –, given the circumstance that the phenomenon occurred, considered effective, that is, from the moment the injunction was granted. In this case, the situation is portrayed in the Decree which, contrary to what was asserted, is in harmony with what was decided in the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality No. 3.075-2/PR, at least with regard to.